• Top Posts

  • Archive

F1 Team Orders OK for 2011

So they have dropped the ban on team orders in #F1. No surprises really as the situation between team cars could have been manipulated in all sorts of ways besides telling one driver that the other was faster.

But it is an interesting situation. There was a time when drivers would do things for the benefit of the team anyway; Peter Collins handing his Ferrari to Fangio at Monza in ’56, giving up his own title shot so that the Maestro could take the championship being a classic example.

For many years the concept of the team hierarchy of a number one and a number two driver was standard. The second seat at Lotus was something of a poisoned chalice during the Clark years, although they did embrace the joint number one package for a while (Clark & Hill, Fittipladi & Peterson). Jackie Stewart was the de facto number one at Tyrrell and so on.

Ferrari have generally always leaned towards a number one with supporting drivers (remember that two cars per team is a fairly recent limit). Phil Hill tried to push Moss into retirement at the final round in ’58, then gave up second to Mike Hawthorn just before the end to gift the latter the title, Bandini let Surtees through to second place and the ’64 title in Mexico (despite actually scoring one point less than Graham Hill who Bandini had also punted off (accidently)). So the Schumacher era at Maranello was nothing new.

Over at Lotus, Peterson helped Andretti to the title in’78. Instances of teams chucking away a championship becuase they let the drivers race are fairly rare. The Alonso & Hamilton thing at McLaren where they raced each other and gave the title away by a point is one example, and Mansell and the Brazilian bloke at Williams in ’86 is another, but it isn’t something you see often, hence all the exitement at Red Bull as the 2010 season drew to a close; would Webber and Vettel race each other out of contention and let Alonso sneak it?

As we know, Vettel walked off with the race and the title after a great drive from him, a less great drive from Webber and a bad call for Alonso. The fuss was that a team who let their two drivers go at it could have given the title away to a team that had played the team orders game, but were the fans really in danger of being cheated? Of course they weren’t.

As for betting scandals, well, there is a precedent, but you have to go all the way back to Tripoli in the 1930’s to find it. I doubt that you could pull that off in modern F1, despite the Alonso/Renault win that followed the Piquet jnr accident the other year.

Team orders are a fact of life and I always felt that the ban was silly as regular readers here will know. Now it’s gone. Roll on 2011.

7th April 1968 – Jim Clark and that F2 Race

Almost every account you read of Jim Clark’s death at Hockenheim describes the event as “an unimportant F2 race” or “minor F2 race” or similar dismissal.

Regular readers of my blogs will know of my campaign against sloppy use of language, and this is another example of it. I can maybe understand a hack from a mainstream rag getting the wrong idea about one of the world’s leading drivers, and the outstanding talent of that time, running in a Formula 2 event, but motoring journalists should know better. So here’s my effort to set the record straight as I see it. Continue reading

Le Mans 24 Hours 1960-69: The official history of the world’s greatest motor race – book review

This is one of a series of albums that each look at a separate decade of the Le Mans 24 Hour race and, as the title indicates, this one revisits the years 1960 to 1969.

The book therefore covers one of the most significant transitions, that of front engine to mid engine, and also of the Ford versus Ferrari battles of the mid years of that decade.

Each year is alocated around 30 pages of text and photos with all of the significant sub plots highlighted, including some of the rarities and unsung heros getting a mention. The range of pictures is excellent with both black & white and colour shots included and the captions are well done too.

The entry lists and results tables come from the organiser and so are accurate even down to some of the less familiar designations and this provides an important reference for historians (contemporary reports were not always complete or accurate).

It is a big book and well worth owning if you have an interst in this era. The reference sections are very useful, but the photos make this a book that you can pick up and browse through at any time. At £40 it isn’t cheap, but worth every penny. However, clicking on the link below can bring you the book at at much more advantageous price.

Le Mans 24 Hours 1960-69: The official history of the world’s greatest motor race (24 Heures Du Mans)

Weekend round up – 21 November 2010 #NASCAR

#NASCAR And so to Homestead for the finale. Things not looking so good for the #11 team after qualifying, but Denny Hamlin is not as flakey as a certain team mate and it looked for a while as though he had pulled it off. JJ has done this before though and he wound up the #48 to put the chase out of reach. Game over – who’d have thought it possible to win 5 in a row, but the chase has screwed up the championship race pretty thoroughly, so these things become possible.

If NASCAR want a 12 car short series then let them run one. The real cup should be about the whole field and the whole season. It’s why my interest in cup level racing has faded since they brought in this competition caution on the season, but there we go; I don’t make the decisions.

With most of the season done and dusted I’ll be doing just one more round up for 2010 to wrap up the #DTM, and then  I plan to report my thoughts on some of the off season events through the Winter. I’m also working on some retro related posts to bring my slant on events of past times in the way that I did for the Sid Collins eulogy for Eddie Sachs, and the first of these relates to Jim Clark and his final race with another coming along on the Ford GT40 at Le Mans. Watch out for these in the coming weeks.

Weekend round up – 14 November 2010 #NASCAR #F1

#NASCAR Well done Todd Bodine on a second truck title. Families likes the Bodines are part of the backbone of racing. Over at the duel in the desert, the Spring Cup rumbles towards a conclusion with just 15 points between the top two and three possible winners. Roll on next week.

#F1 Well, it’s all over for another year. It would be nice if the title could go down to the wire at one of the classic circuits rather than a glorified slot car track, but never mind. “Watta mistake-a to make-a” as Bertorelli used to put it in ‘Allo ‘Allo as Ferarri make amends for the Hockenheim team orders issue by covering Webbo and spoiling Alonso’s chances. Some you win, some you lose. Easy to be right after the fact.

Having said that, the Mineral Water Kid deserved the title with 5 good wins, so no arguments there, and a good result for the sport. Also good to see the McLarens back on form.

Nice also to see Petrov do well. The lad has had a traumatic season, but is learning the ropes and has the right to be on the grid. He had Alonso welll covered for two thirds of the race and that is pressure.